HCBA Logo
Hennepin County
Bar Association
Judge Blaeser



 

Meet the Judges            How District Court Works           Judicial Elections 

 

Judge Robert A. Blaeser

     
Born:   1953
     
Education:   1979  JD  University of Minnesota Law School
1976  BA  Concordia College
     
Recent Career:   1995  Judge, Hennepin County District Court
1990  Robert A. Blaeser and Assoc.
1980  Partner, Blaeser & Johnson, P.A.
1979  Associate, Thomsen, Nybeck, Herbst & Johnson
     
Elevated to Bench:   Appointed by Governor Arne Carlson in 1995.
Elected in 1996, 2002 and 2008.
     
Previous Assignments:  

8/1995 to 12/1996

Criminal

1/1997 to 12/2002 Juvenile (Presiding Judge 8/2000 - 12/2002)

1/2003 to Present

Criminal and Civil

     
Current Assignments:

  Criminal and Civil Presiding Judge
     

More information on this Judge is available from the District Court Website

 
     
     
     
     
     
 

 


Read Profile from

 

Published in
Nov./Dec.1995

 

 

 

   
 
 The Judge's Civil Courtroom Procedures and Advice  
1. What are your preferred procedures regarding motion practice?
 Motions are heard Monday through Friday at 8:30am and 1:30pm. All motions must be scheduled with the judicial clerk. Do not send paperwork for a motion that has not been scheduled with the clerk. One courtesy copy of each document filed with the court for a motion must be delivered to the chambers at least two days prior to the hearing. Do not rely on the filed original document to making it to our chambers prior to the hearing. No post-hearing documents will be accepted without permission granted at the hearing. The Parties are expected to be in the courtroom ready to proceed at the scheduled start time.
 Regarding discovery disputes, no motion will scheduled without a telephone conference with the Court to informally discuss the issues.
 If providing proposed findings, or asked by the Court to provide findings, I prefer a Word document attached to an email to my law clerk.
 
 
2. What are your preferred procedures regarding hearings?
 See above. All hearings in the courtroom will be done with a court reporter present.
 
 
3. What do you expect the attorneys to have ready at the pretrial conference?
 A level of preparation and familiarity with the strengths and weaknesses of the case to make settlement discussions meaningful. The Parties themselves or a representative with full settlement authority must be present.
 
 
4. At what point to you expect the parties to undertake ADR, if at all?
 ADR is discussed early in the process, with a view to deciding which form of ADR will be most helpful to the parties, and when it should occur.
 
 
5. At what point, if any, do you encourage the parties to settle or to exchange settlement offers/demands?
  Does that vary by type of case (personal injury, family, criminal, etc.?)
 Settlement is highly encouraged throughout the process. I try to ask about settlement every time the Parties are present for a hearing or conference call. Written offers are required to be exchanged before trial. I also do settlement conferences on selected cases if I have time during the trial block.  If you think it would be helpful to have a settlement conference, contact my law clerk.
 
 
6. Do you require that a person with ultimate authority to settle be present at settlement negotiations?
 A meaningful pretrial requires the presence of the person with full authority. Pretrials are not scheduled for every case. If a pretrial is scheduled, a person with full authority for each party is required to attend.
 
 
7. How do you expect the parties to handle discovery disputes (including calling you for a ruling during a deposition)?
 No discovery motions will be scheduled without a telephone conference. The Parties may submit papers in advance of the telephone conference. The purpose of the conference is to attempt to mediate or resolve the dispute. The Court may issue a ruling following the conference unless the parties can agree to a resolution. I do not expect to be called during a deposition as that type of an interruption is very disruptive; most questions can be answered subject to objection. If the Parties have multiple discovery disputes, a Special Master may be appointed at the expense of the Parties.
 
 
8. Do you conduct hearings and motions by phone? If so, please describe the procedure you would like attorneys to use to do so, including how testimony is to be transcribed and who puts the teleconference together.
 Only discovery disputes are heard by conference call. The Party requesting the conference call is to initiate the call, join the other parties, and then call the judge. Conference calls are held without a court reporter present. Therefore, no transcript is available of counsel’s argument during a conference call.
 
 
9. Do you have any preferences for courtroom decorum (including but not limited to cell phones, pagers, passing notes, communicating with others at counsel table, water/beverages at counsel table, approaching the witness, courtroom attire)?
 I prefer that counsel follow the Rules of Decorum (Rule 2). No hats. Cell phones and pagers must be silent. Communication at counsel table should be kept to a minimum during testimony, but notes are okay. Water is fine at the counsel table, but no other beverages, including coffee, unless provided by the Court.
 
 
10. When, if ever, would you consider issuing sanctions, formal reprimands, holding an attorney in contempt, or reporting an attorney for unethical behavior?
 This question is difficult to answer without hypotheticals. Attorneys will first be given a warning. If the attorney’s behavior continues, some type of reprimand may be appropriate. I have never held an attorney in contempt, or reported an attorney for unethical behavior. I have imposed monetary sanctions where appropriate.
 
 
11. Under what circumstances do you accept ex parte communications from counsel? Do you consider an attorney’s communication with your clerk a potential ex parte communication?
 Ex parte communications are allowed only as permitted by the rules (i.e. to schedule or cancel hearings, to confirm a hearing, to find out the status of trial setting, and similar matters relating to housekeeping issues). No ex parte communications are permitted regarding the merits of the case. Communications with the clerk are communications with the Court.
 
 
12. What is your practice with granting continuances and under what circumstances would you consider granting one?
 Trial continuances are rarely granted, even if both parties agree. Continuances of motions are usually granted, especially if both parties agree.
 
 
13. With respect to oral argument, do you prefer an attorney to assume you have read the supporting memorandum and exhibits and not reiterate written material?
 Yes, the attorneys will be told prior to oral argument if I have not had the opportunity to review the motion papers.
 
 
14. What do you consider to be the basic requirements of good oral argument (including the amount of time appropriate for oral argument)?
 Organize your argument and be precise. Discuss all major issues briefly, but focus on the hard issues. Be able to respond to the other side’s strongest arguments. Do not try to mislead the Court – concede the weaknesses of your case and accurately cite case law. Expect to be interrupted with questions. Accept the Court’s lead from the questions and focus on the issues raised by the Court. The time allotted depends on the type of motion, the number of parties, and the complexity of the issues.
 
 
15. What preferences do you have for jury trials? How do you prefer voir dire to be conducted?
 Motions in limine, trial memorandum, exhibit lists, witness lists, proposed jury instructions, and proposed special verdict forms are due at least one week before the trial is scheduled to begin. Jury trials and bench trials will be conducted from 9:00 am – 4:30 pm, with a lunch break from approximately 12:00-1:30 pm, a 15 minute break mid-morning, and a 15 minute break mid-afternoon. Motions in limine will be argued on the record prior to voir dire. The Parties are expected to pre-mark their exhibits according to the rules. The Parties are expected to alert the Court in advance of potential issues, so that hearings outside of the presence of the jury can be scheduled without keeping the jury in the hall. Voir dire should be concise. If you have questions you want me to ask, let me know. In a civil case, the Court and counsel will question the panel, and voir dire is usually not recorded. Counsel are asked if they want voir dire on the record.

  
 
   
 The Judge's Criminal Courtroom Procedures and Advice  
1. What are your expectations of attorneys (both defense and state) at arraignment?
Be on time and prepared to pick a pretrial date.

2. What do you see as the bench’s role in settlement at the pretrial stage?
Very active in discussing possible plea agreements.

3. If any, what limitations do you place on ex parte contacts with your staff?
There should be no ex parte contacts regarding substance.

4. When a matter is assigned to you for trial, do you attempt to facilitate settlement before beginning trial?
Yes, unless counsel in good faith indicates that discussions are futile.

5. When in trial, what hours do you normally use for the trial itself (including breaks and lunch recesses)?
Trials will be conducted from 9:00 am – 4:30 pm, with a lunch break from approximately 12:00-1:30 pm, a 15 minute break mid-morning, and a 15 minute break mid-afternoon.

6. What policies do you have concerning weapons, firearms and ammunition exhibits in the courtroom?
Gunlocks will be used. Ammunition must be bagged and kept separate from the gun. Similar precautions will be taken with knives and other weapons. The Clerk will maintain custody once offered and received.

7. What policies do you have concerning drugs and other sensitive exhibits in the courtroom?
Alert me before trial so we can talk about it. Contaminated exhibits must be sealed. The Clerk will maintain custody once offered and received.

8. Do you have any other specific policies concerning exhibits?
Share all exhibits, including demonstrative exhibits, with opposing counsel before trial. Special policies of district court apply to hazardous exhibits.

9. When do you discuss proposed jury instructions with attorneys?
Preferably before trial begins.

10. What are your policies concerning jury sequestration?
A jury will be sequestered only where agreed upon by counsel or unusual circumstances are present.

11. Do you have any specific policies or practices concerning pre-sentence investigations or sentencing?
Use PSIs where required or helpful but not necessarily in every case
.
 
 
   
   
  Judicial Profile from The Hennepin Lawyer  (65:2:16)  
   

Robert A. Blaeser
Originally published in the November/December 1995 issue.
Author: Nancy McLean

On Aug. 21, 1995, Hennepin County and the state of Minnesota welcomed Robert Blaeser as its newest judge. He was appointed by Gov. Arne Carlson and took the oath of office from former Minnesota Supreme Court justice Rosalie Wahl. The swearing-in took place in the Hennepin County Board Room. The standing-room-only crowd of friends and supporters cheered the addition of Blaeser, an American Indian, to the judiciary.

Judge Robert Blaeser, 41, grew up on the White Earth Reservation in northern Minnesota. He is a member of the White Earth Band of the Minnesota Chippewa Tribe. Judge Blaeser’s parents and several extended family members still live on the reservation near Mahnomen, Minn. Both his parents came from large families. He grew up knowing many aunts, uncles, and cousins. Many have moved to other areas of the country and some, to other reservations. He feels the importance of his family and maintains the extended relationships today.

Judge Blaeser was a straight-A student and a football star at Mahnomen High School. After he graduated, he left the reservation for Concordia College in Moorhead, Minn. He was the first member of his family to go to college. He chose Concordia because it was close to home and had an enrollment of only 2,000 students. Judge Blaeser’s college experiences were educational in an academic sense and an eye-opener in a personal sense. Off the reservation, he experienced jokes, bitter remarks, and generally negative attitudes toward American Indians. He seemed to have one foot in each world—Indian and white. This conflict became clear as he traveled the 70 miles from Moorhead to White Earth to visit family and friends.

Judge Blaeser was an excellent student, graduating summa cum laude. He had always assumed that he would return to the reservation after college to teach or work in the field of wildlife management. Sometime during his college years, however, he decided to go to law school. He’s not exactly sure when he made the decision but, gradually, the idea of law school became part of his career plan. Unlike many aspiring law students, Judge Blaeser didn’t know any lawyers. There were no role models; he couldn’t recall anyone from the reservation going to law school.

Since his appointment, Judge Blaeser has reflected on his personal history and changes that have occurred on the reservation where he was raised. One very positive note is the increased emphasis on the importance of education. When he was growing up, it was common for kids to drop out before completing high school. Graduation was simply not a priority. That has changed: the tribe encourages secondary and post-secondary education and even offers financial support to students. Most of the students who leave the reservation for college return. They feel most comfortable with other Indian people and with returning home.

In the fall of 1976, Judge Blaeser enrolled in the University of Minnesota Law School. During his law school years he was involved in many student activities. He was the student director of Legal Assistance to Minnesota Prisoners (LAMP). After his first year of law school, he worked as a law clerk for the field solicitor’s office, revising boundaries for Minnesota Indian reservations. In 1979, he graduated with honors and decided to start his career in the Twin Cities.

Judge Blaeser joined the Edina law firm of Thomsen, Nybeck, Herbst & Johnson. His practice focused in the areas of commercial litigation, personal injury, and workers’ compensation. In 1980, he left to form his own firm in Minneapolis. For the last 15 years he has managed a successful law practice, dealing primarily in the areas of commercial litigation, product liability, personal injury, and workers’ compensation. The majority of his work is done in the Twin Cities; however, he handles a significant number of cases in northwestern Minnesota.

One of his personal accomplishments involved a product-liability case in which he represented the wife and child of a man who had died while installing boat carpet. Judge Blaeser argued that the deceased, an employee of a marine dealership, died from inhaling toxic fumes from a contact cement product he was using. He negotiated a favorable settlement in this case of first impression. He has handled several other complex litigation matters in the metro area and in greater Minnesota.

Judge Blaeser’s experience in complex litigation helps him define the qualities he appreciates in judges. He believes by involving lawyers, the parties, and the people with settlement authority early in the court process, quick settlement can follow. He appreciates the style and abilities of Magistrate Judge Ann Montgomery. She has an ability to bring people together early and encourage settlement. By preparing herself and asking others to be prepared, she was a good role model for a judge who could settle cases.

Judge Blaeser has been involved in many community, legal, and bar association activities. Some commitments have been specific to the Indian communities, others to the organized bar, and still others to the community in which he lived and practiced law. They all demonstrate the diversity that Judge Blaeser brings to the bench.

Judge Blaeser was a founding member of the American Indian Bar Association. During his career, he has served as its first secretary/treasurer and sat until September on its board of directors. The organization cheered his appointment as the only American Indian judge in the state of Minnesota. In addition to the American Indian Bar Association, he has been active in the broader Minnesota Minority Lawyers Association. When he was the owner and manager of a small business (his law firm), Judge Blaeser was active in the American Indian Chamber of Commerce.

In 1994, Judge Blaeser began to serve as an associate judge for the Minnesota Chippewa Tribal Court of Appeals. This volunteer position allowed him to contribute to the tribe using his unique legal skills. He resigned from the Tribal Court of Appeals when he was appointed to the Hennepin County bench. He is alone in the state of Minnesota in bringing this type of prior judicial experience to the state trial courts. In a metropolitan area with a significant American Indian population, this bridge makes Judge Blaeser unique among his judicial peers.

Judge Blaeser was recruited for the Minnesota Supreme Court Racial Bias Task Force. He was one of two American Indians and the only Indian lawyer. He served with distinction and now serves on the Implementation Committee. His work with the task force and his work with the tribal courts brought him to Governor Carlson’s attention and his ultimate appointment to the bench.

In addition to being a leader in the American Indian Bar Association, Judge Blaeser serves on the Minnesota State Bar Association Board of Governors. For the last few years, he has chaired the Hennepin County Bar Association Nominating Committee. He works to diversify boards, committees, and other decision-making bodies within the organized bar by recruiting, nominating, interviewing, and selecting members with different backgrounds and perspectives. Through the contributions of Judge Blaeser and others, the organized bar is beginning to diversify.

By the time this article is published, Judge Blaeser will have been on the bench for three months. He is optimistic about his work and enthusiastic for the change that it brings. He has been a civil litigator for the last 15 years. His first year or two on the Hennepin bench will be spent handling criminal cases. Initially, he will preside over misdemeanor and gross misdemeanor cases and then move to a combination of felonies, gross misdemeanors, and misdemeanors. When he first began to practice law, Judge Blaeser handled some criminal cases but, he said, "That was at least 10 years ago." He is spending his time brushing up on criminal law and procedure, finding it both exhilarating and challenging.

On his first day presiding over court trials in Division IV (Southdale), Judge Blaeser had to deal with a member of the Posse Comitatus who refused to come inside the rail in the courtroom. The man refused to acknowledge the court’s jurisdiction and moved to dismiss his speeding charge citing, among other grounds, the flag and taxes. After the man’s motion was denied, Judge Blaeser was able to convince him to sit at the counsel table. The man was found guilty and Judge Blaeser assessed a fine. He asked the judge how he should pay the fine because the federal reserve notes were not legal tender. Judge Blaeser told him he could pay the fine in gold coins. This example of common sense and good humor is reflective of Judge Blaeser’s start on the bench.

Judge Blaeser has formed some initial impressions of his job and his work. He has been surprised by the number of criminal defendants who appear without counsel. He has assumed the responsibility of ensuring that they know and understand their rights. In addition to the number of pro se defendants, he has also been somewhat surprised by the role that alcohol and drugs play in the cases he has heard—not only in the more common driving offenses, but also in many of the domestic cases he has handled. He has found the probation staff to be most helpful in analysis and recommendation for offenders.

One of the most difficult types of misdemeanor offenses to deal with is the domestic assault. Judge Blaeser has learned early the quandary of detention for domestic abusers. The victim often wants the offender released for financial reasons but is still concerned for her personal safety. "Each case must be decided on its own merits; there are no easy answers," Blaeser has concluded.

Judging others is a new experience for lawyers. Even though Judge Blaeser had experience in the tribal court, there are differences. One large difference is in the volume of misdemeanors and gross misdemeanors in Hennepin County. Another difference is in joining a system of experts. Judge Blaeser has found that others in the system have been welcoming and extremely helpful to him. He has found it helpful to solicit advice from many within the system. He met with prosecutors, defense attorneys, and court system personnel to learn more about their work and how they fit into the criminal justice system. He knows he has to "learn the ropes" and assumes this will be an ongoing process that he will enjoy.

Judge Blaeser brings years of litigation experience, a commitment to the law and his communities, a security about who he is, and an excitement about a new career. These attributes will serve him well on the Hennepin County District Court bench.

Portions of this article have been redacted at the Judge's request.

Back to Top

 

   

Back to Top

 
   
   

   

Legal Notice

Hennepin County Bar Association.   600 Nicollet Mall #390,Minneapolis, MN 55402.   Phone: 612-752-6600.