HCBA Logo
Hennepin County
Bar Association
Judge Cahill



 

Meet the Judges            How District Court Works           Judicial Elections 

 

Chief Judge Peter Cahill

     
Born:    
     
Education:  

1984:  J.D., University of Minnesota Law School
1981:  B.A., University of Minnesota College of Liberal Arts

     

Recent Career:  

  2007:          Judge, Hennepin County District Court 
1997-2007:  Assistant Attorney, Chief Deputy Attorney, 
                   Managing Attorney; Hennepin County 
                   Attorney’s Office
1993-1997:  Solo Practitioner
1988-1993:  Partner, Colich and Cahill
1987-1988:  Associate Attorney, Colich and Wieland
1984-1987:  Assistant Public Defender, 4­th District
 
     
Elevated to Bench:   Appointed in 2007. Elected in 2008.
     
Assignments:  

5/2007 to 10/2008:  Criminal
10/2008 to 12/2009:  Drug Court
1/2010 to 6/2012:  Criminal
7/2010 to 6/2012:  Assistant Chief Judge
07/2012 to present: Chief Judge

     
Current Assignments:

  Chief Judge
 

More information on this Judge is available from the District Court Website

 

 

Read Profile from

 

Published in 
November 2007

   
 
 
  The Judge's Criminal Courtroom Procedures and Advice  

Back to Top

1. What are your expectations of attorneys (both defense and state) at arraignment?

Be on time.  If private attorney, do not wait until the case is called to file your certificate of representation.  Try to have the next court date set up with the prosecutor and clerk before the calendar starts.

 

 

2. What do you see as the bench’s role in settlement at the pretrial stage?

If counsel cannot resolve the case at pretrial, I require the parties to discuss the case with me before setting a trial date.  I think the judge’s role at that point is to suggest alternatives that might not have been discussed to see if the parties can still settle.

 

 

3. If so, what limitations do you place on ex parte contacts with your staff?

Discussion of any case should be limited to scheduling and other administrative matters. Even then, I prefer contact by email with my clerk with the other parties copied on the email.  Saves a lot of phone calls to reschedule an appearance.

 

 

4. When a matter is assigned to you for trial, do you attempt to facilitate settlement before beginning trial?

Yes, for now.  When the new blocking system goes into effect, I hope to limit settlement discussions to the pretrial and limit trial dates to asking whether it is a plea, dismissal or trial without further discussion.

 

 

5. When in trial, what hours do you normally use for the trial itself (including breaks and lunch recesses)?

9:00 to 10:30, 10:50 to 12:00, 1:30 to 3:00, 3:20 to 4:30.  Break times may vary based on witness examination and availability, but the 4:30 deadline will be adhered to fairly rigidly because of jurors’ and participants’ bus schedules, day care, etc.

 

 

6. What policies do you have concerning weapons, firearms and ammunition exhibits in the courtroom?

I follow the Potentially Hazardous Exhibit Policy adopted by the Judicial Council.

 

It reads, in part:

Containment Procedures

The following procedures have been developed to minimize exposure and potential injury of District Court employees and others involved in judicial proceedings related to evidence admission and handling.

Potentially Hazardous Substances and Sharps

Potentially hazardous substances must be contained and/or stored in an approved container and/or storage bag, as outlined below, strong enough to prevent breakage and contain spillage.  The outside of the container and/or storage bag must:

  • clearly identify the contents
  • be marked  with appropriate hazardous warnings (e.g. corrosive,toxic) or labeled with a biohazard label, or both; and
  • be labeled as required by city, state and federal regulations.

Bloodied clothing must be dry and shall be submitted in a sealed wrapping or package that is properly marked and labeled.

Blood vials must be submitted in approved secondary containers that are properly marked and labeled. 

Contaminated sharps (hypodermic needles, razors, knives, etc.) must be submitted with protective coverings or within protective containers.  Examples include sheathed knives and capped needles placed in sealed evidence bags.  Contaminated sharps that cannot be sheathed or capped shall be enclosed in sealed, puncture-resistant containers.

Narcotics

All drugs/narcotics are to be submitted in clear heavy-duty plastic bags or other types of transparent non-breakable containers.  The access point of the bag or other container must be completely sealed with exhibit tape and properly marked and labeled.

Guns & Ammunition

All live ammunition is to be submitted to the Court in labeled and sealed envelopes.

Firearms must have all ammunition removed prior to submission to the Court.  When submitted, the firearm must be in a condition that will not allow the trigger to operate.  For example, firearms must have bolts removed and taped securely to the side or locked to the rear, cylinders swung out, loading gates open, or slides or breeches locked open.

Flammable, Explosive, & Reactive Materials

Flammable, explosive and reactive materials (e.g., black powder, or other explosive or highly reactive materials, excluding ammunition) shall be rendered non-explosive and/or non-reactive prior to submittal to the court.

Other Potentially Hazardous Substances

If any object has the potential of being a hazardous substance, it must be properly sealed, labeled and marked as such.

Improperly submitted evidence

Evidence that does not meet District Court containment specifications for evidence submission may not be accepted.  In order to accommodate the needs of the court, a vendor under contract with the court may be contacted to contain or otherwise modify evidence to meet evidence requirements prior to submission to the court.  In such instances a standard minimum fee of $300 plus the cost of the containment will be charged to the submitting party.

 

 

7. What policies do you have concerning drugs and other sensitive exhibits in the courtroom?

See above.

 

Sensitive or sensational photos will be kept by the clerk and only available with express permission from the bench.

 

 

8. Do you have any other specific policies concerning exhibits?

See above

 

 

9. When do you discuss proposed jury instructions with attorneys?

I ask for proposed instructions after the jury is sworn, but we hold off the instruction conference after both sides have rested.

 

 

10. What are your policies concerning jury sequestration?

Only will consider for homicide cases or if counsel can provide a compelling reason to sequester.

 

 

11. Do you have any specific policies or practices concerning pre-sentence investigations or sentencing?

I strongly discourage pre-plea investigations and will not order them unless the defendant will openly and honestly discuss his or her involvement in the offense.  Pre-pleas for defendants who deny guilt are a waste of time.

 

Pre-sentence investigations will be ordered for person felonies, but only a sentencing worksheet for property and drug felonies.  If counsel has a good reason to request a PSI on a property and drug felony, I will order it.

 

For misdemeanors, PSI’s will be ordered for all domestics and all DWI’s except first-time DWI’s with a test under 0.20.

 

I generally impose the mandatory minimum fine and surcharges but will allow satisfaction of the fine and surcharge with Sentence to Service if the defendant is indigent or payment would cause extreme hardship.  I will give time to pay fines and surcharges, but I do not give extensions on payment deadlines once they are entered as part of the sentence.

 

I do NOT get involved in waiver of any administrative correctional fees (Work release fees, EHM fees, supervision fees, UA fees, DWI course fees, etc.).  All requests to waive or reduce those fees should be directed to DOCC staff as those fees are not a part of the sentence.

 

 Be on time.  Sentencings are scheduled around trials and other calendars.

 

All statements at sentencing (victim impact statements, statements on behalf of a defendant, etc.) should be directed to the Court.  Any attempt to address the defendant, counsel or audience members directly will be quickly cut off and the speaker may be subject to further sanction.

 

 
   
 
  Judicial Profile from The Hennepin Lawyer  (76:10:24)  
   

Peter Cahill
Originally published in the November 2007 issue.
Author: Michael Goodwin

Were it not for a bad case of mononucleosis, Peter Cahill might be pulling teeth and filling cavities today.

Cahill was thinking about becoming a dentist when he came down with mono as a senior in high school.  Unable to work or go to school, Cahill tagged along with his father, a prosecutor, and watched him work.  He remembers being fascinated by the trial process.

Cahill, a native of the Milwaukee area, eventually recovered his health and went on to college at the University of Minnesota.  But the seed for a legal career had been planted, and after college he decided to go on to the University of Minnesota Law School, graduating magna cum laude in 1984.

Now, after more than two decades as a practicing attorney, Cahill is settling into a new role on the bench as a district court judge in Hennepin County.  He was appointed by Gov. Tim Pawlenty in May.

“It’s the best job I’ve ever had,” he said in a recent interview in his chambers at the Hennepin County Government Center.  “You have to figure out what’s fair, and what the law says.  You just have to find the right answer.  How can it get better than that?”

The job also gives Cahill a chance to return to the courtroom, where his legal career began and where he has always felt most at home.  Cahill joined the Hennepin County Attorney’s Office in 1997 as an assistant county attorney in the Violent Crime Division.  He later served as managing attorney in the Juvenile Prosecution Division from 1999 to 2000 and then as chief deputy county attorney from 2000 to 2006.  At the time of his appointment, he was serving as managing attorney in the office’s Special Litigation Division, a position he had held since January of 2007.

Prior to his tenure in the county attorney’s office, Cahill was in private practice, focusing on criminal defense.  He was an attorney in the law firm of Colich and Wieland from 1987 to 1988, a partner in the firm of Colich and Cahill from 1988 to 1993, and a solo practitioner in Wayzata from 1993 to 1997.  He started his legal career in 1984 with the Fourth Judicial District Public Defender’s Office.  Cahill also founded The Blue Pages, Inc., a specialized directory of lawyers in Minnesota, in 1996, and he served as its chief executive officer until 1997.

Cahill said he knew early on in his career that the courtroom was where he wanted to be.  Though he enjoyed being involved in policy decisions during his service with the county attorney’s office, he gets the most satisfaction from being in court.

“I love the challenge [of being in court],” he said.  “It’s the pure practice of law. There is no purer practice than being in the courtroom.  It’s where all the action is.”

It’s a challenge that he still enjoys as a judge, although there are obvious differences between being an advocate and being neutral.

“You’ve got to make the right call.  You’ve got to ask what the law is, and what is fair and just.  It’s not an easy answer sometimes.  You have to step back and listen carefully, and make the best decision.”

Cahill said he is looking forward to learning more about areas of the law in which he has less familiarity, such as family law.  As an experienced trial lawyer, however, he said he has not encountered many surprises in the course of his new job.  He said that the county’s excellent support staff has eased his transition from lawyer to judge, and that he has also received a lot of good advice from his colleagues on the bench.  Cahill said the best advice he has received is to remember that he is the one in charge in the courtroom.

“If you need to take time to think, take it,” he recalls being told by another judge. “Don’t feel pressured to make snap judgments.  Take the time to do a good job.”

Cahill has some advice of his own for attorneys appearing before him in court: be on time, be prepared, and, above all, be respectful.

“I’m big on courtroom decorum,” he said, noting that respect extends not only to the judge, but also to the opposing counsel, the parties involved, and the audience.  “The public deserves a court that is respectful to everyone and is fair and just.”

Throughout his career, Cahill has been involved in service to the profession and to the community.  He has been an active member of the Minnesota County Attorneys Association, serving on the Criminal Law Committee and the Technology Committee.  He is also a member of an advisory task force for CriMNet, a state-level program that works with state and local agencies to make criminal justice information available to officials in law enforcement, the courts, and corrections, and he is part of a group studying possible changes to Hennepin County’s Drug Court.  He has been a frequent CLE speaker as well as a guest lecturer at the University of Minnesota Law School, University of St. Thomas Law School, and William Mitchell College of Law.

“The contributions he will make as a district court judge will extend far beyond the courtroom itself,” Governor Pawlenty said in announcing Cahill’s appointment to the bench.

Cahill, who lives in Plymouth, has served as a member of the City of Plymouth’s Charter Commission, as a coach for the Wayzata High School Mock Trial Team, and as a volunteer judge for the Minnesota State Bar Association High School Mock Trial Tournament.  Cahill and his wife, Jane, have also been involved in the activities of their four children, the youngest of whom is currently a senior at Wayzata High School.  Cahill spends his spare time doing genealogy research, archiving old family photos, and perfecting his barbecuing techniques. 

His main focus, however, is on just becoming a good judge.

“It is such an honor to have this appointment,” he said.  “I want to return the favor by doing a good job.”

Back to Top

   

Back to Top

 
   

   

Legal Notice

Hennepin County Bar Association.   600 Nicollet Mall #390,Minneapolis, MN 55402.   Phone: 612-752-6600.