HCBA Logo
Hennepin County
Bar Association
Judge Karasov



 

Meet the Judges            How District Court Works           Judicial Elections 

 

Judge Fred Karasov

     
Education:   1983     J.D. Degree, William Mitchell College of Law, Cum Laude
1978     M.S.
Degree, Northeastern University,
             Criminal Justice Studies
1976    
B.A. Degree, University of Minnesota,
             Interdepartmental Major
     
Recent Career:  

1982-2008:  Hennepin County Attorney’s Office; Senior Attorney; most recent position, Senior Attorney, Violent Crimes Division; also worked in Juvenile Prosecution Division and Juvenile Protection Division

1988-present:  Minnesota Army National Guard; Judge Advocate General (JAG); currently serving as military judge

2007-present:  Adjunct faculty, William Mitchell College of Law; Advanced Trial Advocacy

1978-1982: Hennepin County Sheriff’s Office; Senior Deputy Sheriff

     
Elevated to Bench:   Appointed in 2008
     
Current Assignments:

  Juvenile
 

More information on this Judge is available from the District Court Website

 

 

Read Profile from

 

Published in 
Sept 2008

   
 
 
  The Judge's Juvenile Courtroom Procedures and Advice  

Back to Top

 1.  Do you have any prior personal or professional experience in juvenile court?
I was a prosecutor in juvenile court from 1983-85 and was the head of the Juvenile Delinquency Division of the Hennepin County Attorney’s Office from 1995-1999.

 

2.  Are you currently using any types of ADR in juvenile court, in particular family group conferencing and restorative justice programs?
Our court is but I haven’t used it in my courtroom yet. I’ve only been a judge in juvenile court since September, 2009. See Chief Judge Quaintance’s responses.


3.  Do you have any new or innovative ideas that you are implementing to manage the high volume of juvenile court cases?
Not personally. Our bench does. See Chief Judge Quaintance’s responses.


4.  Are you in compliance with the timelines in the Rules of Juvenile Court Procedure and the Adoption and Safe Familes Act, and it not, what procedures are you implement to attempt to get in compliance?

We get monthly reports and try very hard to follow the timelines. I’d say we’re pretty much in compliance but there are occasional cases that extend beyond the timelines for a variety of reasons. Sometimes it’s a scheduling issue but mostly the Child Protection Department is requesting the additional time to give the parents time to finish the case plan.


5.  How do you schedule hearings on these cases that often involve 4 or 5 attorneys (county attorney, public defender, attorneys for parent(s), children, guardian ad litem, etc.) and what are you doing to handles the delays that often arise in starting the hearing when all of the attorneys may not be present and may be handling other matters in other courtrooms (especially county attorneys and public defenders)?

This is a terrible problem. My clerks schedule all hearings. We never start a hearing on time and it’s very frustrating. Usually at least one of the attorneys is at another hearing. I have no good solution to this problem but it is very frustrating.

 

 

6.  How do you make sure that private attorneys are kept apprised of possible “standing juvenile court orders” and even that the private attorneys get copies of the orders from their own cases given that the system is so much more geared to government attorneys (i.e. county attorneys and public defenders)?
I would tell the lawyers in court if there are standing orders I’d expect them to follow. We don’t really do anything special to keep them apprised.


7.  Is the court administrator using the Supreme Court forms for private CHIPS petitions and private TPR petitions? Is the court taking responsibility for serving these documents and is a filing fee being charged?
We use the Supreme Court forms.
See Chief Judge Quaintance’s responses for additional information.



8.  With private placement adoption pleadings that receive ex parte review, do you prefer that these go to the adoption clerk or directly to the signing judge?

They go to a guardian ad litem and then they come to the judge handling the adoption calendar that day. Our system works fine.

 

 

9.  Are you allowing motions to be heard at pre-trial conferences?
Yes, as long as the other parties have had sufficient notice.


10 Do you actively engage yourself in settlement negotiations at pre-trial conferences, including expressing what you would do on the case if you were asked to decide it then?

I don’t prejudge the case or tell the parties how I’d rule but I do try to settle cases if the attorneys are amenable and it looks like my efforts might be helpful.


11.  Do you routinely allow the entire child protection file into evidence or do you require each document in file to be admitted separately and in compliance with the rules of evidence?

I follow the case law and allow some but not all of the file.

 

 
   
 
  Judicial Profile from The Hennepin Lawyer  (77:8:14)  
   

Fred Karasov
Originally published in the September 2008 issue.
Author: Michael Goodwin

Fred Karasov was in the middle of his law school career, and was still unsure of what he wanted to do with his degree.  Over lunch one day, a friend suggested he consider a career as a prosecutor.  “It was like a light bulb went off in my head,” said Karasov, recently appointed a district court judge in the Fourth Judicial District after 26 years as a prosecutor.  The idea of going into criminal law “was a perfect fit” since he was working his way through law school as a senior deputy sheriff with the Hennepin County Sheriff’s Office and he had a master’s degree in criminal justice.  Not long after that lunch, he landed a job as a law clerk in the Hennepin County Attorney’s Office and was hired as a prosecutor in that office after passing the bar exam in 1983.

A native of Golden Valley, Karasov earned his bachelor’s degree from the University of Minnesota and his master’s degree from Northeastern University in Boston before earning his law degree from William Mitchell College of Law.  He lives in Minneapolis with his wife, Cathy, and has a daughter and four step-children.  In his spare time, he enjoys reading, running, traveling, and visiting with friends and family.  He has also coached and judged in various moot court and mock trial programs as well as coached youth soccer, softball, and wrestling.

Karasov served in a variety of capacities in the Hennepin County Attorney’s Office.  After starting out in the juvenile division, he later worked as part of the child abuse prosecution team and eventually rose to the level of senior attorney.  He has also served as managing attorney in the Juvenile Prosecution Division and as a supervisor in the Child Protection Section.  At the time of his appointment to the bench in February 2008, he was prosecuting violent crimes and serving as senior attorney for all sexual assault cases.  For four years, he served as the office’s director of policy and training where his primary responsibility was training law enforcement officers in Hennepin County.

Karasov said he loved his job as a prosecutor because he enjoyed handling criminal cases, working with victims and witnesses, and serving the public.  Being a judge allows him to stay in the courtroom and to continue his public service career.  “I think I can make a contribution in a different way,” he said.

Throughout his career, Karasov has made contributions both inside and outside the courtroom.  He has been involved in numerous teaching and training programs throughout the state and country.  He has also been a frequent lecturer and presenter on evidence, child abuse, and sexual assault issues, and he has taught trial advocacy courses at William Mitchell College of Law.  In addition, he has published manuals on child abuse prosecution and sexual assault prosecution for the Minnesota County Attorneys Association.       

He said his teaching and publishing has helped keep him current on the law and improve his own skills as an attorney.  “The best way to learn a topic is by researching the subject, preparing the lessons, and teaching it,” he said.

Karasov also has a long record of military service.  He first served in the Minnesota Air National Guard from 1972 to1976.  From 1988 to 2000, he was an assistant judge advocate in the Judge Advocate General’s Corps with the 34th Infantry Division of the Minnesota Army National Guard.  Since then, he has served as a military judge.  Karasov’s military service took him to Kosovo during 2003-04, where he served as the deputy command judge advocate and worked on issues related to proper expenditure of money for military purposes.  In February 2009, he will be deployed to Baghdad, where he will be chief of military justice.  

Karasov’s career took another turn when he was appointed to the bench in February 2008.  He said he has a lot of people to thank for his success, including the people with whom he has worked with during his career.  “I’ve been lucky to have worked with and for good people and I would not have gotten where I am today without their support, encouragement, and advice.”

Karasov said that being a judge allows him to serve justice in a different way than he did as a prosecutor.  He said that he wants people to feel like they have been treated fairly and respectfully in his courtroom, even if they do not agree with the way he rules on an issue.  “I want to do my part to increase public confidence in the justice system,” he said. “I want everyone who walks into my courtroom to believe that justice has been done, that I listened respectfully, and that I tried my best to make an informed decision.  I believe that I can influence the way people perceive the system by the way that I act.”

Further, he said that it is important for judges to take time to make a decision if they need to, but also not to cause unnecessary delay to the legal process. “You’ve got to have the courage to make the best decision and then not dwell on it or agonize over it,” he said.

Like any judge, he expects that the attorneys that appear before him will be well-prepared and will present sound, succinct, and cogent arguments. “I expect the same things of lawyers that I expect of myself,” he said.

Looking back on his career as a prosecutor, Karasov has never regretted taking his friend’s advice and he is looking forward to his new role.  “Being a prosecutor is the best of a lot of worlds, and part of me will miss it, but being a judge is a great job in a different way, and I am looking forward to this new opportunity.”

Back to Top

   

Back to Top

 
   

   

Legal Notice

Hennepin County Bar Association.   600 Nicollet Mall #390,Minneapolis, MN 55402.   Phone: 612-752-6600.