HCBA Logo
Hennepin County
Bar Association
Judge Ranum



 

Meet the Judges            How District Court Works           Judicial Elections 

 

Judge Jane Ranum

     
Born:    
     
Education:  

1979:  Hamline University School of Law,  J.D.

1969:  East Carolina University, B.S.

     

Recent Career:  

  1982-2008:  Assistant Hennepin County Attorney.
1991-2006:  Minnesota State Senator, elected to five terms.
1982:  Fourth Judicial Law Clerk, Honorable William S. Posten.
1969-76: Elementary School Teacher.
     
Elevated to Bench:   Elected in 2008.
     
Current Assignments:

  Criminal.
 

More information on this Judge is available from the District Court Website

 

 

Read Profile from

 

Published in 
May 2009

   
 
 
  The Judge's Criminal Courtroom Procedures and Advice  

Back to Top

1. What are your expectations of attorneys at arraignment?
I expect attorneys to be prepared to argue bail/conditions of release, and to have their calendars available to schedule future proceedings. 
 
 
2. What do you see as the bench’s role in settlement at the pretrial stage?
I will not try to force settlement but am willing to help facilitate settlement. 
 
 
3. If so, what limitations do you place on ex parte contacts with your staff?
Attorneys may contact my staff directly about purely administrative issues, such as scheduling or filings. Any request that is not purely administrative should be addressed to me. All email correspondence must go to both parties. 
 
 
4. When a matter is assigned to you for trial, do you attempt to facilitate settlement before beginning trial?
Yes, unless the parties indicate that settlement talks are futile. 
 
 
5. When in trial, what hours do you normally use for the trial itself (including breaks and lunch recesses)?
Generally I start at 9:00 a.m. and go until 4:30. We take an hour for lunch and have two 20 minute breaks. Other breaks will be provided as needed. In rare occasions we may go until 5:00 p.m., but only with prior notice to jurors, since they are initially advised of our daily schedule. 
 
 
6. What policies do you have concerning weapons, firearms and ammunition exhibits in the courtroom?
Attorneys must give prior notice and follow all conditions of the district court’s standing order. Firearms must be made safe by a deputy and a trigger lock is required. All weapons must be sealed in plastic, and ammunition must be stored separately. They must be stored out of sight, and only pointed at the floor. 
 
 
7. What policies do you have concerning drugs and other sensitive exhibits in the courtroom?
Attorneys must give prior notice and adhere to all policies of the district court for sensitive items, including drugs, weapons, or biohazard materials. Biohazard includes exhibits containing any amount of bodily fluids. Any request to remove the item(s) from plastic must be presented to the court outside the presence of the jury. All sensitive exhibits must be kept out of the jury’s sight until they are introduced. When court is not in session, they will be secured by my clerk in a locked container.
 
 
8. Do you have any other specific policies concerning exhibits?
I ask that attorneys let my clerk know if they have any special needs, such as perishables or large exhibits. If a party wishes to present audio or visual recordings, they must provide opposing counsel with a transcript (per the rules of court) and provide their own equipment for replay. Exhibits should be marked before trial, including demonstrative exhibits. All demonstrative evidence should be shown to opposing counsel prior to the start of trial. 
 
 
9. When do you discuss proposed jury instructions with attorneys?
Preferably before the trial begins, and throughout the trial as needed. My goal is always to minimize the amount of waiting or disruption the jury experiences, and having all documents completed as early as possible makes this easier. 
 

10. What are you policies concerning jury sequestration?
Sequestration should be ordered only when absolutely necessary.
 
 
11. Do you have any specific policies or practices concerning pre-sentence investigations or sentencing?
I order PSIs as court policy and statutes require. For sentencing I permit written victim impact statements, which may be read to the court. I also permit community impact statements as permitted by law.

 

 
   
 
  Judicial Profile from The Hennepin Lawyer  (76:5:20)  
   

Jane Ranum
Originally published in the May 2009 issue.
Author: Jason Tarasek

No one could figure out why he was always so dirty.  Without fail, the young child was just filthy every morning he arrived at Head Start, an extra-curricular program for low-income children. His behavior was dreadful; he frequently bit other children. Most of the teachers simply assumed that he never bathed. Then they figured it out: this young African American in the 1960s South lived in a house with dirt floors. No personal-hygiene regimen would help him avoid the dirt in his house. It was inevitable, therefore, that he would be dirty each morning when he arrived for the Head Start program. So the Head Start teachers simply arranged for the youngster to change into clean clothes each morning. The resulting transformation was unexpected. “His entire personality changed,” said Jane Ranum, who was one of those Head Start teachers, noting that the child—once clean—gained self-confidence, transformed his behavior, and stopped biting other children. It was a lesson that Ranum would never forget. “If you understand what causes something and the behavior behind it, you’re better able to deal with it.”

Ranum, who was recently elected to the Hennepin County bench, was born and raised in Davidson, N.C., and came of age during the turbulent civil-rights era. As a witness to the growing pains of a nation, Ranum developed the ethos that would guide her life.

A fast-walking bundle of energy, Ranum followed in the footsteps of her mother, who—also a schoolteacher—sought the peaceful integration of schools in the South.  During her first year as a teacher at a “middle-class white school,” a federal desegregation order forced Durham County, N.C., to begin educating kids of all races together. Ranum was amazed by the inequality that separated black schools from white schools. “I saw firsthand the difference in facilities—the difference in books and things.” Recently, thinking back on those challenging times, she observed that the struggles “left an indelible mark on me.”

Ranum recognizes that her experiences as a teacher prepared her for life as a legislator and, now, as a judge. As a teacher, she worked with her colleagues, parents, and students in a joint effort to “come together to focus on children.”

After her first year of teaching, Ranum left North Carolina to travel in Europe. Before she knew it, she had a job offer that would change her life. While teaching on a U.S. military base in Germany, she met the man who would become her husband. Thirty-seven years ago, she returned with him to his home state, Minnesota, where she knew precisely one person: him. Ranum taught for four more years in Minnesota but after watching her husband graduate from law school, she decided to make a career change, too. “If he could do it, I could do it,” she said.

After she passed the bar in 1979, she didn’t know what to do next. After all, she was pregnant. So, for the next two years, Ranum worked part-time out of her home on family-law matters. 

Later, Ranum clerked for the Hon. William S. Posten of Hennepin County and, in 1982, joined the Hennepin County Attorney’s Office, where she would serve as a criminal prosecutor for more than 25 years. Around the same time, she also began volunteering for her local schools—a task that soon led her to lobby the Minnesota Legislature on issues related to women and children. Eventually, she played a leading role in successfully obtaining the passage of a citywide school referendum. Before she knew it, her friends and colleagues began encouraging her to run for office. At first, she said, “no.”

Insisting that “it never crossed my mind” to run for office, Ranum said she just kept doing things that she loved. “I never had a plan. [My career] just evolved as I kept doing what I thought was best. You always have to follow your passion. My passion was for healthy families and children.”

Ranum was elected to the first of five terms in the Minnesota Senate in 1991. Serving portions of south Minneapolis and some neighboring suburbs, she focused upon legislation aimed at keeping women and children safe.

During her time in the Legislature, she served as chair of various high-profile committees. She does not anticipate that her role as judge will be much different than her experience chairing committees in which she always guaranteed that “both sides would have their say.”

In her experience, Ranum said that even people who lose at trial typically are content so long as they feel that they were treated fairly. “Most people want to believe they had an opportunity to be heard by a neutral person with an open mind.”

Her experience as a teacher, legislator, and criminal prosecutor will inform her decision-making on the bench. At the county attorney’s office, Ranum served as a senior attorney on the drug prosecution team responsible for felony cases. Earlier in her career with the prosecutor’s office, she worked with the Child Support Enforcement Division and the juvenile court with responsibility for child-protection and juvenile-delinquency cases.

Her experiences have allowed her to acquire “an understanding of the complexity of domestic-violence issues” and issues of child abuse and neglect. “When I think of what I did as a teacher,” she said, “I saw it from a child’s point of view ... and I’ve also seen it from the standpoint of an attorney.  People who have not dealt with issues like these do not understand the dynamics.”

Among her goals as a judge will be to protect kids before they become criminal defendants. “It’s so important to make sure we’re making good decisions early on in what’s in the best interests of the child,” said Ranum, who filled the seat vacated by the retiring Judge Thomas W. Wexler.

Ranum is still married to the man she met almost 40 years ago on a military base in Germany.  They have a 29-year-old daughter, who works for the University of Minnesota.

Ranum is a voracious reader who also habitually exercises by walking around Minneapolis lakes. Ranum’s office is adorned—among other reminders of her past—with Hmong textiles. These were  a gift from her good friend, Mee Moua, the Minnesota legislator who was the first Hmong American elected to public office in the United States. Although she considers herself a Minnesotan, she said she will always retain her Southern heritage. “You can’t ever take where you grew up out of you.”

Today, Judge Ranum faces a docket of cases involving the same child-protection and domestic-violence issues that she has confronted her entire life. It would be difficult to imagine a judge more uniquely qualified for those challenges than Jane Ranum.

Back to Top

   

Back to Top

 
   

   

Legal Notice

Hennepin County Bar Association.   600 Nicollet Mall #390,Minneapolis, MN 55402.   Phone: 612-752-6600.