|
Phillip
D. Bush
Originally published in
the July/August 1989 issue.
Author: Bev Wolfe
Portions of this profile were
redacted on request of the Judge.
Philip
Diehl Bush brings to the bench an extensive background in
criminal law. He majored in Criminal Justice Studies and
Sociology as an undergraduate and received a Master of Arts in
Criminological Studies from Sheffield University in England.
Judge Bush has taught college courses on criminal justice
studies and has done work on criminal justice studies both as a
research fellow at Erasmus University in the Netherlands and as
a research specialist at the Ford Foundation.
In additional to
his strong academic background in criminal justice, Judge Bush
has served as an Assistant Hennepin County Public Defender for
the past nine years.
Judge Bush
decided to become an attorney in 1972 while he was working as a
paralegal for a small law firm.
From 1980-1985,
Judge Bush worked in the Litigation Division of the public
defender’s office. His work included representing both adults
and juveniles charged with felony and misdemeanor offenses,
parties in dependency/neglect or termination of parental rights
suits, and men in paternity suits. During his tenure in this
division, Judge Bush represented well over 1500 indigent
clients.
In 1985, Judge
Bush transferred to the office’s Research, Appeals and
Training Division and remained there until his appointment to
the bench. In this division he wrote briefs and orally argued
many cases before Minnesota’s appellate courts and prepared
all amicus curiae briefs submitted by his office. His
responsibilities included providing education and training to
staff members, development of office policy and procedures, and
computerization of office procedures and systems. In addition,
he served as the office’s representative to county task forces
including the Hennepin County Juvenile Civil Commitment Task
Force and the Hennepin County Day Fine Task Force.
As a public
defender, Judge Bush defined his role as assuring his clients
had a fair trial and were fully accorded their rights no matter
how unpopular.
Judge Bush has
compiled an impressive list of publication credits including an
article he co-authored on the future of voir dire for which he
was awarded the Minnesota Bar Association’s Author Award. He
has also served as a lecturer at numerous continuing legal
education programs.
Judge Bush
considers his two most significant accomplishments as an
attorney to be his efforts in assisting battered women and his
help in subjecting juvenile court proceedings to greater
appellate scrutiny. Judge Bush has represented both sides in
battered women cases. He has represented men who have assaulted
women and battered women who have killed their assailants. He
has been a speaker and resource person for the Minnesota
Coalition for Battered Women and has served as a consultant for
defense attorneys across the state who represent battered women.
Through his appellate work, Judge Bush attempted to increase
appellate courts’ supervision over juvenile court procedures.
Due to the closed nature of the juvenile court system, Judge
Bush believes it is essential to enlarge the appellate courts’
supervision of juvenile court procedures. He has sought to
accomplish this goal by seeking writs from the appellate courts
and by appealing certain cases that raise important issues
pertaining to the due process rights of juveniles.
Judge Bush hopes
to encourage computerization of more of the court’s processes.
He has already been a major contributor to increasing the
efficiency of the public defender’s office through the use of
computers. Judge Bush hopes that the increased use of personal
computers will lighten the bench’s workload and give
individual judges more time to make the hard decisions they are
often called upon to make.
He has found his
work as a public defender to be very rewarding, but sometimes
frustrating. He enjoyed the working environment within the
public defender’s office, but admits that on an emotional
level the work can be difficult. He is leaving his position as
an advocate with mixed emotions but looks forward to the
different responsibilities and challenges his position on the
bench will bring.
Philip Bush is
married to an attorney in private practice. They have two sons.
|